Boss Media single deck blackjack
•
House edge and rules
•
Basic strategy charts
•
Unusual plays
•
Composition dependent variations: add 20 percent!
•
Randomness test
•
Recommended Casinos
•
Game location and settings
•
The Gambling Budget and variance
•
Ken Smith's report
House edge and rules
Boss Media have a single-deck blackjack game with an overall payout of 100.15% with perfect
play - one of the few games that offers a player advantage without factoring in comp points.
The rules are:
• Soft 17
• Double On Any
• Double After Split
• Full peek
Basic strategy charts
The following is the correct
basic strategy for this game - the top row represents the dealer's up card,
the left-hand column the player hand. The tables were generated using Ken Smith's
basic strategy engine:
S =
stand, H =
hit, D =
double, P =
split
Hard totals
Your hand | Dealer upcard |
2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | A |
17+ | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S |
16 | S | S | S | S | S | H | H |
H | H | H |
15 | S | S | S | S | S | H | H |
H | H | H |
14 | S | S | S | S | S | H | H |
H | H | H |
13 | S | S | S | S | S | H | H |
H | H | H |
12 | H | H | S | S | S | H |
H | H | H | H |
11 | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D |
10 | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | H |
H |
9 | D | D | D | D | D |
H | H | H | H | H |
8 | H | H | H | D | D | H | H | H | H | H |
5 - 7 | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H |
Soft totals
Your hand | Dealer upcard |
2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | A |
A9 | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S |
A8 | S | S | S | S | D | S | S | S | S | S |
A7 | S | D | D | D | D | S |
S | H |
H | S |
A6 | D | D | D | D | D |
H |
H | H | H | H |
A5 | H | H | D | D | D | H |
H | H | H | H |
A4 | H | H | D | D | D | H |
H | H | H | H |
A3 | H | H | D | D | D | H | H | H |
H | H |
A2 | H | H | D | D | D | H | H | H |
H | H |
Pairs
Your hand | Dealer upcard |
2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | A |
As | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P |
10s | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S |
9s | P | P | P | P | P | S | P | P | S |
S |
8s | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P |
7s | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | H |
S | H |
6s | P | P | P | P | P | P | H |
H | H | H |
5s | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | H |
H |
4s | H | H | P | P | P | H | H | H |
H | H |
3s | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | H |
H | H |
2s | P | P | P | P | P | P | H | H |
H | H |
Unusual plays
As with the Cryptologic single deck game, there are several non-intuitive plays here. They are:
9 v. 2 = double, not hit.
11 v. A = double, not hit.
A2 v. 4 = double, not hit.
A3 v. 4 = double, not hit.
A6 v. 2 = double, not hit.
A8 v. 6 = double, not hit.
8 v. 5 = double, not hit.
8 v. 6 = double, not hit.
33 v. 8 = split, not hit
44 v. 4 = split, not hit
66 v. 7 = split, not hit
77 v. 8 = split, not hit
77 v. 10 = stand, not hit.
These take some getting used to - doubling a soft 19 against dealer 6 is a very odd move for
anyone familiar with standard multi-deck strategy. However...
...sometimes you make the perfect hand!
NEVER be tempted to deviate from perfect strategy; the edge in this game is extremely small, and
the tiniest deviation will result in turning your advantage over to the casino.
Composition dependent variations: add 20 percent!
As with the other single deck blackjack games, you can eak out an additional 0.03% return by
applying the relevant composition-dependent variations. 0.03 doesn't seem an awful lot, but it
represents 20% of the overall 0.15% return, pushing the total return up to 100.18%.
To learn all the variations would be quite a task, but it shouldn't be hard to learn at least
the two and three-card exceptions:
Two Cards:
1. 8 (6+2) vs 5 = Hit
2. 8 (6+2) vs 6 = Hit
3. 12 (7+5) vs 3 = Stand
4. 12 (8+4) vs 3 = Stand
5. 12 (10+2) vs 4 = Hit
6. 12 (10+2) vs 6 = Hit
7. 13 (10+3) vs 2 = Hit
Three Cards:
Basic Strategy Changes:
1. 12 vs 3 = Stand
2. 16 vs 10 = Stand
Exceptions:
1. 13 (10+2+A) vs 2 = Hit
2. 15 (5+5+5) vs 10 = Stand
3. 15 (6+5+4) vs 10 = Stand
4. 15 (6+6+3) vs 10 = Stand
5. 16 (6+5+5) vs 9 = Stand
6. 16 (8+4+4) vs 9 = Stand
7. 16 (8+5+3) vs 9 = Stand
8. 16 (6+6+4) vs 10 = Hit
9. 16 (7+6+3) vs 10 = Hit
10. 16 (8+6+2) vs 10 = Hit
11. 16 (9+6+A) vs 10 = Hit
(Credits to
The Wizard Of Odds.)
For the others, see the
Microgaming composition dependent exceptions
page - all those applying to the Microgaming single deck game also apply here.
Randomness test
For a long time I had my doubts about the Boss Media single deck game. When I first played it,
the table limit was $500 and I could not imagine that a casino could sustain such a loss rate
from high-stakes perfect basic strategy players, assuming a fair game - at 200 hands an hour, the
casino would lose on average $150 per hour to such a player! Additionally, my own experiences of
the game were not good, and I concluded that, all things considered, it was wisest to consider
the game as potentially not fairly dealt.
However, I logged back into the game recently and found that the maximum bet had been capped at
just $50. Since this was rather more realistic, giving a player win rate of only $15 per hour, I
decided to run a 5000-hand test and study the results for the purposes of highlighting any
possible anomalies. 5000 hands is by no means a conclusive sample, but it's enough to give a
reasonable idea of the game.
Here are the results.
1) The overall figures and the percentage they represent out of the
total hand-count:
These figures are all close enough to expectation. Worthy of note is that the player blackjack
tally is actually bang on expectation, at 4.82%, and that the overall double return is good and
marginally over expectation - 57% wins and 43% losses.
2) The results, expected value, standard deviation and return percentage after each set of
a thousand hands. Of note is that all the cumulative sessions fall well within one standard deviation.
3) The splits hands:
Splits are so relatively rare that you need an awful lot more than 5000 hands to be able to draw
meaningful conclusions from the data, but for what it's worth, these results are in line with
expectation, with wins comfortably outnumbering losses.
There is nothing in this test to suggest that the Boss Media single deck game is not fairly dealt,
so I have to reverse my long-held belief and give the game a clean bill of health.
Recommended casinos
My recommendation for where to play the Boss Media single deck game:
♠
Pharaoh's Casino ♠
As far as I know, Pharaohs is in fact the only Boss casino offering this game.
Game location and settings
For the location of the game see the screenshot below:
Table games / one deck blackjack / private play.
You can see a "settings" tab at the bottom - this offers speed and table spread alternatives. You
can choose between two bet spreads: $1 to $10, or $10 to $50. The maximum bet for this game is
$50.
The gambling budget and variance
Never forget that gambling games are subject to the ups and down of variance - and the more you
play, the greater the variance you'll encounter. To illustrate the extent of these swings, take a
look at the chart below, based on the same five incremental sets of 1000 hands as studied in the
above test:
To use the chart, first chose a target number of hands, then select a bet size you think you'd be
comfortable with - for example, 4000 hands at $20 a hand.
The standard deviation of 4000 hands we can see is 72.73. At $20 a hand, one standard deviation
equates to a total of 72.73 X $20 = $1454.60. Taking into account your expectation of +6 units
(or $120) after 4000 hands, one standard deviation up equates to a win of $1604, and one down,
a loss of $1334.
If we extend this to TWO standard deviations, then we have results which lie within the range of
-$2789.20 and +$3029.20.
In plain English: you have a one in twenty chance of being down to the tune of around $2800 after
4000 $20 hands of a blackjack game with a player advatage.
Ouch.
Never play outside your comfort-zone. You can beat this game in the long run - but only if you
avoid going broke along the way!
For more on standard deviation, see the "
volatility in blackjack"
section of my blackjack page.
Ken Smith's Report
Blackjack expert Ken Smith from the excellent
"
Blackjack info" site conducted a test a few months
before mine. He reported his results in several posts on his
blackjack blog, starting with his
first session report
and ending with his
final summary.
All the other reports have convenient links posted in a
single deck blackjack post
in his forum.
Page top
© 2005 - 2022 hundred percent gambling